Match statistics snapshot
- Parma created the clearer chances on xG (2.71 vs 0.77, Δ 1.94).
- Como held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Parma | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 2.71Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.77 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 6Lead | Shots off target |
| 5 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Parma | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 250 | Accurate passes | 424Lead |
| 311 | Total passes | 493Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Parma | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Parma | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 0.24 | Goals prevented | 0.24 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Parma | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |