Match statistics snapshot
- Parma created the clearer chances on xG (0.57 vs 0.43, Δ 0.14).
- Parma fired more attempts (10 vs 6 shots).
- Como held more of the ball (71% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Parma | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 0.57Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.43 |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Parma | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 29% | Ball possession | 71%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 177 | Accurate passes | 526Lead |
| 234 | Total passes | 584Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Parma | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Parma | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| 0.49 | Goals prevented | 0.49 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Parma | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |