Match statistics snapshot
- Cremonese created the clearer chances on xG (0.36 vs 0.79, Δ 0.43).
- Parma fired more attempts (8 vs 7 shots).
- Cremonese was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Parma | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 0.36 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.79Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Parma | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 318 | Accurate passes | 319Lead |
| 398Lead | Total passes | 387 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Parma | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Parma | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| 0.33 | Goals prevented | 0.33 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Parma | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |