Match statistics snapshot
- Inter created the clearer chances on xG (0.33 vs 2.57, Δ 2.24).
- Inter fired more attempts (26 vs 4 shots).
- Inter was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Parma | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 0.33 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.57Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 16Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 11Lead |
| 0 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 26Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Parma | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 298 | Accurate passes | 591Lead |
| 386 | Total passes | 662Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Parma | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Parma | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| 0.00 | Goals prevented | 0.00 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Parma | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |