Match statistics snapshot
- Pisa created the clearer chances on xG (1.64 vs 1.71, Δ 0.07).
- Parma fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- Parma was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Parma | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 1.64 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.71Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Parma | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 345Lead | Accurate passes | 337 |
| 405Lead | Total passes | 392 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Parma | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Parma | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.15 | Goals prevented | 0.15 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Parma | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |