Match statistics snapshot
- Beerschot VA fired more attempts (16 vs 15 shots).
- Patro Eisden was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 31%).
- Beerschot VA held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Patro Eisden | Statistic | Beerschot Va |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 11 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Patro Eisden | Statistic | Beerschot Va |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 244 | Accurate passes | 434Lead |
| 313 | Total passes | 496Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Patro Eisden | Statistic | Beerschot Va |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Patro Eisden | Statistic | Beerschot Va |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Patro Eisden | Statistic | Beerschot Va |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |