Match statistics snapshot
- Patro Eisden fired more attempts (19 vs 8 shots).
- KRC Genk II was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 21%).
- KRC Genk II held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Patro Eisden | Statistic | Krc Genk Ii |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Patro Eisden | Statistic | Krc Genk Ii |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 157 | Accurate passes | 356Lead |
| 233 | Total passes | 434Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Patro Eisden | Statistic | Krc Genk Ii |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Patro Eisden | Statistic | Krc Genk Ii |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Patro Eisden | Statistic | Krc Genk Ii |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.