Match statistics snapshot
- PAU fired more attempts (19 vs 11 shots).
- Grenoble was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 26%).
- PAU held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pau | Statistic | Grenoble |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pau | Statistic | Grenoble |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 460Lead | Accurate passes | 300 |
| 520Lead | Total passes | 366 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pau | Statistic | Grenoble |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pau | Statistic | Grenoble |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pau | Statistic | Grenoble |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |