Match statistics snapshot
- PAU fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Nancy was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 27%).
- PAU held more of the ball (73% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pau | Statistic | Nancy |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pau | Statistic | Nancy |
|---|---|---|
| 73%Lead | Ball possession | 27% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 563Lead | Accurate passes | 155 |
| 638Lead | Total passes | 224 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pau | Statistic | Nancy |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pau | Statistic | Nancy |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pau | Statistic | Nancy |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.