Match statistics snapshot
- PEC Zwolle created the clearer chances on xG (1.13 vs 0.13, Δ 1.00).
- PEC Zwolle fired more attempts (17 vs 5 shots).
- Almere City FC was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 12%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.13Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.13 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 415Lead | Accurate passes | 212 |
| 536Lead | Total passes | 325 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |