Match statistics snapshot
- Almere City FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.18 vs 1.56, Δ 0.38).
- Almere City FC fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- PEC Zwolle held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.18 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.56Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 461Lead | Accurate passes | 265 |
| 544Lead | Total passes | 351 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.53 | Goals prevented | -0.53 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |