Match statistics snapshot
- Feyenoord created the clearer chances on xG (0.74 vs 2.22, Δ 1.48).
- Feyenoord fired more attempts (13 vs 4 shots).
- Feyenoord was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| 0.74 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.22Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 7 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 281 | Accurate passes | 427Lead |
| 379 | Total passes | 526Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |