Match statistics snapshot
- Feyenoord created the clearer chances on xG (0.80 vs 3.21, Δ 2.41).
- Feyenoord fired more attempts (22 vs 7 shots).
- Feyenoord was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| 0.80 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.21Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 348 | Accurate passes | 358Lead |
| 432 | Total passes | 432 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 12Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| 0.59 | Goals prevented | 0.59 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |