Match statistics snapshot
- PEC Zwolle created the clearer chances on xG (2.26 vs 2.09, Δ 0.17).
- Groningen fired more attempts (16 vs 14 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Groningen |
|---|---|---|
| 2.26Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.09 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 11 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 5 | Shots off target |
| 5 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Groningen |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 310Lead | Accurate passes | 302 |
| 405Lead | Total passes | 404 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Groningen |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Groningen |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
| 1.38 | Goals prevented | 1.38 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Groningen |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |