Match statistics snapshot
- Heerenveen created the clearer chances on xG (1.37 vs 2.82, Δ 1.45).
- Heerenveen fired more attempts (20 vs 13 shots).
- Heerenveen was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 1.37 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.82Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 421Lead | Accurate passes | 328 |
| 518Lead | Total passes | 413 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.