Match statistics snapshot
- Heerenveen created the clearer chances on xG (0.89 vs 1.11, Δ 0.22).
- Heerenveen fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- PEC Zwolle was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 0.89 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.11Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 270 | Accurate passes | 317Lead |
| 365 | Total passes | 419Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| -0.02 | Goals prevented | -0.02 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.