Match statistics snapshot
- Heracles created the clearer chances on xG (0.62 vs 1.00, Δ 0.38).
- Heracles fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- PEC Zwolle was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Heracles |
|---|---|---|
| 0.62 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.00Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Heracles |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 271 | Accurate passes | 347Lead |
| 363 | Total passes | 423Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Heracles |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Heracles |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| -0.40 | Goals prevented | -0.40 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Heracles |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 18 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |