Match statistics snapshot
- Sparta Rotterdam created the clearer chances on xG (1.13 vs 1.33, Δ 0.20).
- Sparta Rotterdam fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- PEC Zwolle was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Sparta Rotterdam |
|---|---|---|
| 1.13 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.33Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Sparta Rotterdam |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 379Lead | Accurate passes | 366 |
| 468Lead | Total passes | 467 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Sparta Rotterdam |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Sparta Rotterdam |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.68 | Goals prevented | -0.68 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Sparta Rotterdam |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |