Match statistics snapshot
- Twente created the clearer chances on xG (1.14 vs 2.62, Δ 1.48).
- Twente fired more attempts (26 vs 6 shots).
- PEC Zwolle was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Twente |
|---|---|---|
| 1.14 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.62Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 18Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 12Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 26Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Twente |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 298 | Accurate passes | 317Lead |
| 377 | Total passes | 390Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Twente |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 12Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Twente |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.28 | Goals prevented | 0.28 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pec Zwolle | Statistic | Twente |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |