Match statistics snapshot
- Penarol created the clearer chances on xG (2.53 vs 0.07, Δ 2.46).
- Penarol fired more attempts (20 vs 4 shots).
- Penarol was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Penarol | Statistic | The Strongest |
|---|---|---|
| 2.53Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.07 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Penarol | Statistic | The Strongest |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 409Lead | Accurate passes | 244 |
| 479Lead | Total passes | 321 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Penarol | Statistic | The Strongest |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Penarol | Statistic | The Strongest |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| -0.34 | Goals prevented | -0.34 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Penarol | Statistic | The Strongest |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.