Match statistics snapshot
- Pendikspor created the clearer chances on xG (2.31 vs 1.67, Δ 0.64).
- Amed fired more attempts (18 vs 11 shots).
- Amed was more accurate in front of goal (28% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pendikspor | Statistic | Amed |
|---|---|---|
| 2.31Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.67 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 11Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pendikspor | Statistic | Amed |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 361 | Accurate passes | 382Lead |
| 419 | Total passes | 435Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pendikspor | Statistic | Amed |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pendikspor | Statistic | Amed |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pendikspor | Statistic | Amed |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |