Match statistics snapshot
- Al-Gharafa fired more attempts (17 vs 14 shots).
- Persepolis FC was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 24%).
- Persepolis FC held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Persepolis Fc | Statistic | Al-gharafa |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Persepolis Fc | Statistic | Al-gharafa |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 332Lead | Accurate passes | 233 |
| 412Lead | Total passes | 304 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Persepolis Fc | Statistic | Al-gharafa |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Persepolis Fc | Statistic | Al-gharafa |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Persepolis Fc | Statistic | Al-gharafa |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.