Match statistics snapshot
- Persepolis FC fired more attempts (14 vs 8 shots).
- Persepolis FC was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Persepolis Fc | Statistic | Al-nassr |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 9Lead | Shots off target |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Persepolis Fc | Statistic | Al-nassr |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 391 | Accurate passes | 414Lead |
| 484 | Total passes | 496Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Persepolis Fc | Statistic | Al-nassr |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Persepolis Fc | Statistic | Al-nassr |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 1Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Persepolis Fc | Statistic | Al-nassr |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.