Match statistics snapshot
- Persepolis FC fired more attempts (14 vs 8 shots).
- Persepolis FC held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Persepolis Fc | Statistic | Al Shorta |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots off target |
| 4 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Persepolis Fc | Statistic | Al Shorta |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 390Lead | Accurate passes | 201 |
| 467Lead | Total passes | 271 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Persepolis Fc | Statistic | Al Shorta |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Persepolis Fc | Statistic | Al Shorta |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Persepolis Fc | Statistic | Al Shorta |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.