Match statistics snapshot
- Pakhtakor fired more attempts (19 vs 9 shots).
- Persepolis FC was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Persepolis Fc | Statistic | Pakhtakor |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target |
| 9Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Persepolis Fc | Statistic | Pakhtakor |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 402Lead | Accurate passes | 336 |
| 488Lead | Total passes | 427 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Persepolis Fc | Statistic | Pakhtakor |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Persepolis Fc | Statistic | Pakhtakor |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Persepolis Fc | Statistic | Pakhtakor |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.