Match statistics snapshot
- Persib Bandung fired more attempts (15 vs 8 shots).
- Hangzhou Greentown was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 40%).
- Persib Bandung held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Persib Bandung | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Persib Bandung | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 261Lead | Accurate passes | 246 |
| 327Lead | Total passes | 308 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Persib Bandung | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Persib Bandung | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Persib Bandung | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |