Match statistics snapshot
- AFC Wimbledon fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- Peterborough was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 7%).
- Peterborough held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Peterborough | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Peterborough | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 433Lead | Accurate passes | 273 |
| 540Lead | Total passes | 386 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Peterborough | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Peterborough | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 10Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Peterborough | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |