Match statistics snapshot
- Peterborough created the clearer chances on xG (3.29 vs 0.74, Δ 2.55).
- Peterborough fired more attempts (13 vs 12 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Peterborough | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 3.29Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.74 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 2 | Shots off target |
| 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Peterborough | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 75%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 283Lead | Accurate passes | 273 |
| 375 | Total passes | 393Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Peterborough | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Peterborough | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Peterborough | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |