Match statistics snapshot
- Peterborough fired more attempts (24 vs 2 shots).
- Peterborough was more accurate in front of goal (21% on target vs 0%).
- Peterborough held more of the ball (67% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Peterborough | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 24Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Peterborough | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 457Lead | Accurate passes | 196 |
| 528Lead | Total passes | 279 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Peterborough | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Peterborough | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Peterborough | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 2 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |