Match statistics snapshot
- Peterborough fired more attempts (20 vs 6 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 25%).
- Peterborough held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Peterborough | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Peterborough | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 476Lead | Accurate passes | 283 |
| 550Lead | Total passes | 364 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Peterborough | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Peterborough | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Peterborough | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |