Match statistics snapshot
- Pafos created the clearer chances on xG (1.02 vs 2.06, Δ 1.04).
- Pafos fired more attempts (16 vs 6 shots).
- Pafos was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Petrocub | Statistic | Pafos |
|---|---|---|
| 1.02 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.06Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Petrocub | Statistic | Pafos |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 320 | Accurate passes | 421Lead |
| 402 | Total passes | 522Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Petrocub | Statistic | Pafos |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Petrocub | Statistic | Pafos |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -0.08 | Goals prevented | -0.08 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Petrocub | Statistic | Pafos |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.