Match statistics snapshot
- Enppi fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Enppi was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 9%).
- Enppi held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Petrojet | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Petrojet | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 65% | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 214 | Accurate passes | 239Lead |
| 330 | Total passes | 370Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Petrojet | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Petrojet | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Petrojet | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.