Match statistics snapshot
- Petrojet fired more attempts (13 vs 12 shots).
- Petrojet was more accurate in front of goal (23% on target vs 8%).
- Enppi held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Petrojet | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 4 |
| 9Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Petrojet | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 59% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 133 | Accurate passes | 355Lead |
| 224 | Total passes | 436Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Petrojet | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Petrojet | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Petrojet | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.