Match statistics snapshot
- Future FC created the clearer chances on xG (0.52 vs 1.92, Δ 1.40).
- Future FC fired more attempts (17 vs 7 shots).
- Petrojet was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Petrojet | Statistic | Future Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 0.52 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.92Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Petrojet | Statistic | Future Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 58% | Pass accuracy | 77%Lead |
| 132 | Accurate passes | 324Lead |
| 228 | Total passes | 422Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Petrojet | Statistic | Future Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Petrojet | Statistic | Future Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.45 | Goals prevented | -0.45 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Petrojet | Statistic | Future Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.