Match statistics snapshot
- Al Ittihad fired more attempts (11 vs 7 shots).
- Pharco was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 27%).
- Al Ittihad held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pharco | Statistic | Al Ittihad |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pharco | Statistic | Al Ittihad |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 284 | Accurate passes | 365Lead |
| 382 | Total passes | 454Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pharco | Statistic | Al Ittihad |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pharco | Statistic | Al Ittihad |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pharco | Statistic | Al Ittihad |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.