Match statistics snapshot
- Ceramica Cleopatra fired more attempts (21 vs 12 shots).
- Ceramica Cleopatra was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 42%).
- Ceramica Cleopatra held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pharco | Statistic | Ceramica Cleopatra |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 12Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pharco | Statistic | Ceramica Cleopatra |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 199 | Accurate passes | 404Lead |
| 298 | Total passes | 510Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pharco | Statistic | Ceramica Cleopatra |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pharco | Statistic | Ceramica Cleopatra |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 9Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pharco | Statistic | Ceramica Cleopatra |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.