Match statistics snapshot
- El Gouna FC fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- Pharco was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 29%).
- Pharco held more of the ball (68% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pharco | Statistic | El Gouna Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pharco | Statistic | El Gouna Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 68%Lead | Ball possession | 32% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 59% |
| 416Lead | Accurate passes | 142 |
| 522Lead | Total passes | 240 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pharco | Statistic | El Gouna Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pharco | Statistic | El Gouna Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pharco | Statistic | El Gouna Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |
Statistics is not available yet.