Match statistics snapshot
- Pharco created the clearer chances on xG (1.70 vs 1.08, Δ 0.62).
- Pharco fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- El Mokawloon was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pharco | Statistic | El Mokawloon |
|---|---|---|
| 1.70Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.08 |
| 3Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pharco | Statistic | El Mokawloon |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 60% | Pass accuracy | 60% |
| 216Lead | Accurate passes | 186 |
| 359Lead | Total passes | 309 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pharco | Statistic | El Mokawloon |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pharco | Statistic | El Mokawloon |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -0.62 | Goals prevented | -0.62 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pharco | Statistic | El Mokawloon |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.