Match statistics snapshot
- Enppi fired more attempts (5 vs 4 shots).
- Pharco held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pharco | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 3Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target |
| 1 | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 5Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pharco | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 389Lead | Accurate passes | 188 |
| 451Lead | Total passes | 262 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pharco | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pharco | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pharco | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.