Match statistics snapshot
- Pharco was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 10%).
- Enppi held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pharco | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 2 | Shots off target |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pharco | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 182 | Accurate passes | 271Lead |
| 263 | Total passes | 348Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pharco | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pharco | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pharco | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.