Match statistics snapshot
- Pharco fired more attempts (11 vs 9 shots).
- Ismaily SC was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pharco | Statistic | Ismaily Sc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots off target |
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pharco | Statistic | Ismaily Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 281 | Accurate passes | 301Lead |
| 372 | Total passes | 375Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pharco | Statistic | Ismaily Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 2Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pharco | Statistic | Ismaily Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pharco | Statistic | Ismaily Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 18Lead | Fouls | 21 |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 4Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.