Match statistics snapshot
- Smouha SC fired more attempts (6 vs 4 shots).
- Smouha SC was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
- Smouha SC held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pharco | Statistic | Smouha Sc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 4Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 2Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 6Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pharco | Statistic | Smouha Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 63% | Pass accuracy | 75%Lead |
| 187 | Accurate passes | 273Lead |
| 296 | Total passes | 363Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pharco | Statistic | Smouha Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pharco | Statistic | Smouha Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pharco | Statistic | Smouha Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 16Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.