Match statistics snapshot
- Zamalek SC fired more attempts (23 vs 7 shots).
- Pharco was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 30%).
- Zamalek SC held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pharco | Statistic | Zamalek Sc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 17Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 11Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 23Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pharco | Statistic | Zamalek Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 234 | Accurate passes | 433Lead |
| 321 | Total passes | 507Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pharco | Statistic | Zamalek Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pharco | Statistic | Zamalek Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pharco | Statistic | Zamalek Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.