Match statistics snapshot
- Philadelphia Union created the clearer chances on xG (1.13 vs 1.04, Δ 0.09).
- Philadelphia Union fired more attempts (18 vs 13 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Philadelphia Union | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 1.13Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.04 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 10Lead | Shots off target | 5 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Philadelphia Union | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 352Lead | Accurate passes | 239 |
| 458Lead | Total passes | 351 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Philadelphia Union | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Philadelphia Union | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -1.36 | Goals prevented | -1.36 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Philadelphia Union | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.