Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (0.81 vs 1.49, Δ 0.68).
- Philadelphia Union fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Philadelphia Union | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 0.81 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.49Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Philadelphia Union | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 303 | Accurate passes | 458Lead |
| 409 | Total passes | 553Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Philadelphia Union | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Philadelphia Union | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.08 | Goals prevented | -0.08 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Philadelphia Union | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |