Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (0.85 vs 1.06, Δ 0.21).
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (9 vs 8 shots).
- Inter Miami held more of the ball (69% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Philadelphia Union | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 0.85 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.06Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Philadelphia Union | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 31% | Ball possession | 69%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 222 | Accurate passes | 605Lead |
| 301 | Total passes | 688Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Philadelphia Union | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Philadelphia Union | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Philadelphia Union | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |