Match statistics snapshot
- Pisa created the clearer chances on xG (2.47 vs 1.18, Δ 1.29).
- Cagliari fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- Pisa was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pisa | Statistic | Cagliari |
|---|---|---|
| 2.47Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.18 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pisa | Statistic | Cagliari |
|---|---|---|
| 28% | Ball possession | 72%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 156 | Accurate passes | 500Lead |
| 226 | Total passes | 572Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pisa | Statistic | Cagliari |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pisa | Statistic | Cagliari |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -0.19 | Goals prevented | -0.19 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pisa | Statistic | Cagliari |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| 1 | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.