Match statistics snapshot
- Pisa fired more attempts (19 vs 2 shots).
- Catanzaro was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 42%).
- Catanzaro held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pisa | Statistic | Catanzaro |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pisa | Statistic | Catanzaro |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 352 | Accurate passes | 399Lead |
| 417 | Total passes | 479Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pisa | Statistic | Catanzaro |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pisa | Statistic | Catanzaro |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pisa | Statistic | Catanzaro |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 16Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |