Match statistics snapshot
- Cosenza fired more attempts (15 vs 8 shots).
- Pisa was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 33%).
- Pisa held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pisa | Statistic | Cosenza |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 0 |
| 6Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pisa | Statistic | Cosenza |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 501Lead | Accurate passes | 299 |
| 587Lead | Total passes | 367 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pisa | Statistic | Cosenza |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pisa | Statistic | Cosenza |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pisa | Statistic | Cosenza |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |