Match statistics snapshot
- Cremonese created the clearer chances on xG (0.92 vs 0.97, Δ 0.05).
- Pisa was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 23%).
- Cremonese held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pisa | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 0.92 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.97Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pisa | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 226 | Accurate passes | 418Lead |
| 299 | Total passes | 500Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pisa | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pisa | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| -0.05 | Goals prevented | -0.05 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pisa | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |